Research Application Prioritisation

Complete a focused intervention that advances Research Application Prioritisation. The objective is to remove ambiguity around research application prioritisation, give the founder a decision-ready output, and make it clear whether the venture should progress, repeat the task with stronger evidence, escalate to expert support, or move into a linked stage.

Bertie or a programme manager assigns Research Application Prioritisation when the venture needs a decision-ready output for this group. Typical triggers include group-gate reviews, evidence gaps identified by the co-pilot or founder request.

research asset; IP or publication status; research team; technology maturity; candidate applications; specific context for research application prioritisation.

1. 1Define the Research Application Prioritisation Objectivesexpand_more

   Establish the precise commercial boundary and mandate for evaluating academic research applications. Frame the strategic criteria required to differentiate between raw academic discovery and viable, scalable commercial use cases.

   Objective

   Clarifying this action defines the strategic mandate and scope for evaluating how academic IP transitions into real-world applications. It prevents the venture team from burning resources on commercially unviable research branches and ensures alignment across academic and commercial stakeholders.

   What's expected

   The founder must deliver a defined scope document outlining the core evaluation framework, strategic constraints, and decision thresholds for application selection. This must include explicit boundaries regarding spinout ambitions, licensing targets, and target market sectors.

   Consultant stress-test · 5 questions

   1. 1.What specific commercial trigger mandates prioritising research applications at this exact stage of development?
   2. 2.How do you reconcile conflicting priorities between academic publication goals and commercial application timelines?
   3. 3.Why have you chosen these specific strategic constraints, and what high-potential applications do they explicitly exclude?
   4. 4.What evidence demonstrates that your partner university or research institution agrees with this prioritisation scope?
   5. 5.How does this task's scope directly align with your broader commercialisation pathway and funding strategy?

   Open action arrow_forward
2. 2Isolate Specific High-Value Academic Application Use Casesexpand_more
3. 3Collect Research Data and Market Intelligence Inputsexpand_more
4. 4Execute the Research Application Prioritisation Frameworkexpand_more
5. 5Stress-Test Application Ranking and Supporting Evidenceexpand_more
6. 6Anchor Prioritisation Asset and Direct Next Stageexpand_more

• A data-room asset titled Research Application Prioritisation
• A clear task output, updated venture DNA and recommended next action
• It should update the venture DNA with specific evidence or decisions about research application prioritisation, create a visible milestone in the founder journey, and generate one or more recommended next tasks

A mentor or evaluator can review the output at the group gate. Programme managers can require an advisor checkpoint before Bertie moves the venture forward.

Draft your output and let Bertie review it