Stress-Test Intake Evidence and Decision Quality
Conduct a critical review of the intake artefact against rigorous commercial criteria and independent evidence standards. Challenge all unbacked assertions regarding market demand, technical scalability, and team commitment.
Independent stress-testing ensures the intake recommendation is robust, defensible, and free from confirmation bias or academic optimism. It safeguards venture resources by identifying hidden flaws prior to formal data room publication.
Complete an evidence audit checklist detailing the verification level of each technical and market claim, highlighting areas of high uncertainty, and documenting required risk mitigations.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What independent, non-academic validation exists to back up your primary performance claims?
- 2
How have you stress-tested the researchers' willingness to accept commercial terms and investor governance?
- 3
Where is the evidence weakest in your assessment of target market applications and customer switching costs?
- 4
How did you control for academic confirmation bias when assessing the commercial viability of this research?
- 5
What critical technical tests must be re-run by a third-party laboratory before committing further venture capital?