Evaluate Stage Completion and Determine Next Pathway
Conduct a comprehensive review of founder outputs against defined completion criteria and stage-gate requirements. Render a clear decision to progress the venture, repeat specific modules, escalate to spinout committees, or pivot.
Performing this final evaluation provides a clear, evidence-based mandate for the venture's next phase. It prevents continuous funding of unviable university projects and optimizes support allocation.
Publish a formal Decision Document signed off by programme leads, specifying the exact progression pathway, required follow-on resources, and updated Venture DNA metrics. Define explicit next-step tasks for the founder.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What critical evidence leads you to recommend progression rather than halting or pivoting this spinout?
- 2
How does the final recommendation account for remaining IP, freedom-to-operate, or TTO friction points?
- 3
If repeating a module is required, what specific, measurable evidence gaps must the founder bridge?
- 4
How clear and actionable are the assigned next tasks for the founder as they exit this programme stage?
- 5
Why is the recommended support pathway the most capital-efficient route for this specific university venture?