Formalise Eligibility Criteria and Recommendation Logic
Detail the specific qualification thresholds, exclusion rules, and algorithmic logic required to route ventures effectively across mapped programmes. The founder establishes deterministic rules and weighted parameters that handle overlapping eligibility conditions.
Codifying explicit eligibility logic eliminates subjective interpretation and manual bottlenecks in venture assessment. This forms the analytical foundation necessary for automated dashboard routing and scalable ecosystem orchestration.
The founder must deliver a detailed logic schema mapping hard criteria, soft criteria, exclusion triggers, and priority scoring rules across all selected programmes. This must include documented decision trees for handling ventures that trigger multiple overlapping criteria.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
How do your eligibility rules handle edge-case ventures that meet financial thresholds but fail sector-specific mandates?
- 2
What empirical data supports the weighting assigned to soft criteria versus hard statutory metrics?
- 3
Where does the recommendation logic break down when two public programmes offer competing or mutually exclusive support?
- 4
How have you ensured that state aid or Subsidy Control Act limitations are built directly into the exclusion logic?
- 5
What evidence demonstrates that your recommendation rules do not inadvertently penalise underrepresented founder demographics?