Benchmark Exit Readiness Across Core Dimensions
The founder evaluates the venture against standardised exit readiness criteria across financial health, legal defensibility, team reliance, and market positioning. They assign objective numerical scores to each dimension based on explicit rubrics and benchmarking guidelines.
Completing this action establishes a quantitative baseline score that accurately reflects the venture's overall transaction readiness. It translates qualitative operational states into a clear decision-ready diagnostic score for investors and advisors.
The founder must produce a completed scoring matrix covering key dimensions such as IP defensibility, revenue predictability, key-person dependency, and compliance. Each assigned score must be accompanied by a brief written justification referencing specific operational facts.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What specific criteria did you use to justify giving yourselves a high score in operational scalability and governance?
- 2
How does your self-assessed exit readiness score compare against typical benchmarks for successfully acquired ventures in your domain?
- 3
Why have you assigned a favourable score to customer retention when gross churn remains above industry standards?
- 4
How severely does your key-person risk score drag down the overall aggregate exit readiness rating?
- 5
What logic prevents you from discounting your financial readiness score given the current revenue concentration risks?