Review Quality and Evidence Strength
Conduct a rigorous, critical audit of the completed artefact against objective standards of proof. The founder actively seeks counter-examples, tests the depth of market access claims, and exposes any logical leaps.
Stress-testing the output ensures the venture thesis rests on robust, defendable facts rather than optimism. It protects the venture from wasting capital on thesis assumptions that fail under scrutiny.
A completed quality review log detailing stress-test results, identified logic gaps, and verified evidence ratings. The founder must show clear proof of challenging their own assumptions.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What is the weakest piece of evidence in your asset, and why have you accepted it as sufficient?
- 2
How would a hostile industry expert challenge your claim of non-obvious market insight?
- 3
What assumptions about your network's willingness to buy have you converted into verified commercial commitments?
- 4
Where does your logic rely on past market conditions that may no longer apply post-macroeconomic shifts?
- 5
If forced to downgrade one area of your unfair advantage from strong to unproven, which would it be and why?