Determine Review Verdict and Log Venture Decision
Record a definitive formal verdict—continue, repeat, pivot, escalate, or defer—regarding the readiness of the investor product roadmap asset. The founder updates the central venture DNA repository with verified data, logs key risks, and assigns the next stage-gate actions. This formalises the governance decision and sets up clear operational momentum.
Completing this action provides unambiguous strategic clarity on whether the investor roadmap is fit for external presentation. It ensures the venture operates with disciplined governance and clear accountability for all generated follow-on tasks.
The founder must deliver a formal Review Note containing the explicit verdict, a summary of validated evidence, updated venture DNA records, and assigned follow-on tasks. The documentation must clearly state whether the roadmap is ready for data-room inclusion.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
On what exact grounds have you justified a 'continue' decision despite the identified technical dependencies?
- 2
If the verdict is 'repeat' or 'escalate', what specific data trigger will move this task to completion?
- 3
How does this decision impact your target timeline for opening the upcoming investment round?
- 4
What specific updates have been committed to the central venture DNA repository following this review?
- 5
Who holds ultimate accountability for delivering the immediate next tasks generated by this verdict?