Define Scope and Core Decision Boundary
The founder specifies the exact digital touchpoints, user journeys, or features to be tracked within the taxonomy. They articulate the precise commercial or product decision that this tracking data must inform, such as feature deprecation, paywall timing, or onboarding redesign.
Establishing this scope clarifies exactly why telemetric data is being collected and prevents tracking bloat. It ensures the taxonomy is built backwards from key strategic decisions rather than forwards from vanity metrics, maximising venture speed.
A written scope document identifying the boundaries of the MVP or product area to be tracked. It must include a declared strategic hypothesis and a clear decision rule tied directly to telemetry outcomes.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What specific commercial decision will instantly fail if this telemetry data is inaccurate?
- 2
Why did you include secondary feature interactions in this scope before validating the core conversion bottleneck?
- 3
How does your definition of the tracking boundary align with your current engineering capacity to maintain analytics code?
- 4
What evidence proves that this boundary captures the critical value exchange for the user rather than internal process steps?
- 5
If this taxonomy only answers one key question about user behaviour this quarter, which question must that be?