Gather Core Technical Architecture Inputs
The founder compiles all existing codebase documentation, infrastructure diagrams, third-party library dependencies, and current developer velocity logs. They audit historical shortcuts taken during early prototyping alongside feedback from current engineering leads or contract developers.
Completing this action establishes a comprehensive repository of technical artefacts and historical development decisions. It ensures the technical debt evaluation is grounded in actual codebase realities rather than subjective recollections, maximising the accuracy of the overall assessment.
The founder must present an inventory of repository links, architectural schematics, dependency manifests, and documented technical compromises. This must be accompanied by explicit notes on past deployment bottlenecks and code quality concerns highlighted by the development team.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What direct evidence links these architectural diagrams to the actual code running in production today?
- 2
How have you verified that your developer velocity logs accurately reflect friction caused by poor code structure rather than changing product scope?
- 3
Which critical code repositories or third-party integrations have been omitted from this initial audit, and why?
- 4
How did you ensure contract developers disclosed all workarounds and temporary patches introduced during fast-paced sprints?
- 5
What specific metrics prove that your team's historical technical compromises are currently slowing down feature delivery?