Validate Intake Rigour and Evidence Strength
Stress-test the intake methodology against historical corporate projects and competitive benchmarks. Audit the depth of evidence required at intake to ensure it balances thoroughness with execution velocity.
Rigorous validation guarantees that the intake mechanism effectively filters out weak concepts without creating bureaucratic inertia. This maximises venture survival rates by upholding institutional quality standards.
A quality review audit documenting stress-test outcomes, false-positive rates, review velocity metrics, and evidence strength scores.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What proportion of historical corporate innovation failures would have been correctly filtered out by this framework?
- 2
What evidence demonstrates that the required intake evidence is sufficient to justify initial venture seed funding?
- 3
How do you ensure that strict intake criteria do not kill off counter-intuitive or disruptive opportunities prematurely?
- 4
How fast can a high-priority opportunity clear this intake process without sacrificing diligence quality?
- 5
What objective verification prevents submitters from inflating market sizes or technical readiness scores?