Configure Programme Stages Gates and Resources
Select and sequence specific venture-building modules, stage gates, and expert support networks for the programme curriculum. Define quantitative progression criteria for each stage gate to ensure objective evaluation of venture traction. Align mentor pools and diagnostic tools to address identified capability gaps across the cohort.
Configuring these structured pathways ensures that venture progression is rigorously benchmarked rather than subjectively assessed. It creates a scalable, transparent framework that maximises founder progression and justifies public expenditure.
Publish a fully structured Acceleration Framework Document featuring codified stage-gate criteria, resource allocation matrices, and mentor matching logic. Include explicit metrics required for passing each venture development milestone.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What hard evidence proves your stage-gate thresholds accurately filter for long-term venture viability?
- 2
How have you stress-tested the mentor matching logic against the actual technical needs of deep-tech founders?
- 3
Why did you select these specific progression metrics over standard commercial valuation benchmarks?
- 4
How does your resource allocation model handle ventures that fail a gate but demonstrate strategic regional importance?
- 5
What prevents founders from gaming the completion criteria to secure public follow-on grant funding?