Evaluate Outcomes and Direct Support Pathways
Conduct rigorous stage-gate reviews to determine whether ventures should graduate, repeat tasks, or exit to specialised support. Analyse aggregate programme performance against national public agency objectives and regional economic benchmarks. Route graduating ventures into linked ecosystem pathways, including institutional investors and export assistance.
Evaluating outcomes delivers definitive progression decisions for every participant, removing operational uncertainty. It maximises public return on investment by systematically directing high-performing ventures into optimal downstream growth channels.
Deliver a final Programme Evaluation and Offboarding Register detailing exit decisions, progression recommendations, and downstream ecosystem routing for all participating ventures. Present an executive briefing to public agency sponsors.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What objective data justifies your decision to graduate ventures that failed to meet primary revenue targets?
- 2
How do your downstream routing pathways ensure long-term regional retention of high-growth ventures?
- 3
Why did specific high-potential ventures fail to progress, and what structural changes prevent this recurrence?
- 4
What evidence proves the national management layer yielded a better return on public capital than localized initiatives?
- 5
How will you track long-term economic impact once ventures transition out of active programme support?