Evaluate Sprint Outcomes and Direct Next Pathway
Review overall sprint performance against completion criteria to determine whether to proceed, re-test, escalate, or terminate the venture concept. The founder assigns clear status indicators and selects the next sequential venture-building module.
Evaluating the sprint outcomes provides a definitive progression decision based on rigorous evidence thresholds. It prevents premature commitment of venture resources and seamlessly transitions the venture into the next growth stage.
The founder must produce a formal Sprint Completion Sign-off Document detailing the final go/no-go/pivot decision, updated venture DNA records, and a prioritised list of recommended next tasks. The document must state explicit justification for the chosen pathway based on sprint evidence.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What objective data proves that this venture has passed the threshold to advance rather than repeat the discovery sprint?
- 2
How does the recommended next task directly address the highest-priority risks remaining in your venture DNA?
- 3
If the decision is to proceed, what specific evidence gap must be closed in the immediate next module?
- 4
Why is escalating to specialist support necessary, and what precise problem will that specialist solve?
- 5
How does this final decision align with the overall strategic thesis established at the start of the programme?