Bertie
search
arrow_back Group 3: Team Formation, Company Creation & Governance
auto_awesomeAI Co-Pilotinventory_2Data-room outputperson_checkAdvisor checkpoint
Task 50 · Group 3

Advisor Board Formation

Advisor Board Formation helps the founder or programme team build a first usable version of advisor gaps, advisor roles, incentives and meeting cadence. Within Team Formation, Company Creation & Governance, it turns a broad or uncertain area of the venture into a concrete Bertie work product that can be reviewed, improved and reused. The task is intentionally discrete: it should produce a specific artefact, decision, evidence item or risk signal rather than general learning notes.

Objective

Produce a first complete and usable asset for Advisor Board Formation. The objective is to remove ambiguity around advisor gaps, advisor roles, incentives and meeting cadence, give the founder a decision-ready output, and make it clear whether the venture should progress, repeat the task with stronger evidence, escalate to expert support, or move into a linked stage.

When this task is assigned

Bertie or a programme manager assigns Advisor Board Formation when the venture needs a decision-ready output for this group. Typical triggers include group-gate reviews, evidence gaps identified by the co-pilot or founder request.

Dependencies & prerequisites

founder profiles; current team status; role expectations; ownership assumptions; venture thesis if available; draft inputs or template to complete; specific context for advisor gaps, advisor roles, incentives and meeting cadence.

Actions in this task
6 actions
  1. The founder reviews existing venture collateral, founder capability matrices, and current governance documentation against standard advisory frameworks. They gather details of prior commitments, warm network contacts, and current skill shortages to establish a clear baseline. This initial grounding ensures the advisory structure is designed around genuine operational needs rather than unvalidated assumptions.

    Objective

    Audit current capability maps and existing founder materials to select the appropriate advisory board template. Establishing a clear baseline ensures the advisory structure directly targets verified venture blind spots rather than duplicating internal skills.

    What's expected

    A populated baseline document referencing current team capabilities, identified functional gaps, and the selected advisory template structure. The founder must provide a clear inventory of existing contacts, informal mentors, and current governance assets ready for formalisation.

    Consultant stress-test · 5 questions
    1. 1.What specific criteria did you use to choose this baseline advisory template over a lighter informal mentoring structure?
    2. 2.How have you audited your existing founding team skills to ensure this template targets genuine operational gaps?
    3. 3.Which existing informal relationships have you included, and what concrete evidence shows they are suited for formal advisory roles?
    4. 4.How does the selected template align with your immediate 12-month milestone requirements and fundraising strategy?
    5. 5.Where does your current documentation fail to distinguish between functional operational support and high-level strategic advice?
    Open action arrow_forward
Expected outputs
  • A data-room asset titled Advisor Board Formation
  • A completed working asset, template, framework or decision-ready document that can be stored in the data room
  • It should update the venture DNA with specific evidence or decisions about advisor gaps, advisor roles, incentives and meeting cadence, create a visible milestone in the founder journey, and generate one or more recommended next tasks
AI co-pilot support

Bertie co-pilot summarises founder/team inputs, identifies role or governance gaps, prepares advisor/legal briefs, and checks consistency with funding-readiness needs. For this task, it should focus on advisor gaps, advisor roles, incentives and meeting cadence, prompt the founder for missing inputs, draft or improve the output, flag weak assumptions, and record the result back into the relevant data-room section.

Advisor / human support

A mentor or evaluator can review the output at the group gate. Programme managers can require an advisor checkpoint before Bertie moves the venture forward.

scienceTry the loop: co-pilot simulation

Draft your output and let Bertie review it