Early Governance Setup
Early Governance Setup helps the founder or programme team build a first usable version of board/advisor rhythm, decision records and governance basics. Within Team Formation, Company Creation & Governance, it turns a broad or uncertain area of the venture into a concrete Bertie work product that can be reviewed, improved and reused. The task is intentionally discrete: it should produce a specific artefact, decision, evidence item or risk signal rather than general learning notes.
Produce a first complete and usable asset for Early Governance Setup. The objective is to remove ambiguity around board/advisor rhythm, decision records and governance basics, give the founder a decision-ready output, and make it clear whether the venture should progress, repeat the task with stronger evidence, escalate to expert support, or move into a linked stage.
Bertie or a programme manager assigns Early Governance Setup when the venture needs a decision-ready output for this group. Typical triggers include group-gate reviews, evidence gaps identified by the co-pilot or founder request.
founder profiles; current team status; role expectations; ownership assumptions; venture thesis if available; draft inputs or template to complete; specific context for board/advisor rhythm, decision records and governance basics.
The founder gathers all current company records, informal meeting notes, advisor agreements, and existing governance templates. They review current practice against baseline seed-stage governance requirements to establish a clear starting point.
ObjectiveCompleting this action establishes a baseline inventory of the venture's current governance maturity. It prevents redundant effort by anchoring the asset in existing materials while aligning the structure with standard venture-building frameworks.
What's expectedA catalogued set of existing governance documents, notes, and template selections assembled in the working environment. The founder must produce a clear gap assessment between current informal practices and the required standard.
Open action arrow_forwardConsultant stress-test · 5 questions- 1.What specific gap exists between your current informal updates and a formal board reporting rhythm?
- 2.Why have you chosen this particular governance template over a light-touch advisory board framework?
- 3.How do your current advisor agreements align with the intellectual property assignment requirements in the template?
- 4.What legacy decisions have been made verbally that currently lack a documented audit trail?
- 5.How does this starting framework reflect the specific voting rights outlined in your cap table?
- A data-room asset titled Early Governance Setup
- A completed working asset, template, framework or decision-ready document that can be stored in the data room
- It should update the venture DNA with specific evidence or decisions about board/advisor rhythm, decision records and governance basics, create a visible milestone in the founder journey, and generate one or more recommended next tasks
Bertie co-pilot summarises founder/team inputs, identifies role or governance gaps, prepares advisor/legal briefs, and checks consistency with funding-readiness needs. For this task, it should focus on board/advisor rhythm, decision records and governance basics, prompt the founder for missing inputs, draft or improve the output, flag weak assumptions, and record the result back into the relevant data-room section.
A mentor or evaluator can review the output at the group gate. Programme managers can require an advisor checkpoint before Bertie moves the venture forward.
