Formulate Progression Verdict and Update Data Room
The founder synthesises the evaluation findings into a definitive governance decision: continue, repeat, pivot, escalate, or defer. They update the venture data room with the finalised Non-Dilutive Funding Stack Review and log updated decisions into the venture DNA. This creates a transparent record for advisors, board members, and future investors.
Completing this action provides clear governance leadership and updates the venture's permanent data room with a defensible funding strategy. It ensures the venture moves forward with confidence, escalates to advisors where necessary, or pivots away from unviable grant pursuits.
A formal governance verdict document signed off by leadership, specifying one explicit decision (continue, repeat, pivot, escalate, or defer) alongside a clear rationale. The venture data room and venture DNA must be updated with the finalised non-dilutive stack asset and next-step recommendations.
Five questions an expert would ask when reviewing your output
Use these to challenge assumptions, pressure-test your logic, and check the quality of this action's output in the context of the parent task and wider venture development.
- 1
What explicit criteria justify a 'continue' decision given the unresolved match-funding risks identified in the review?
- 2
If escalating to external grant writing or tax specialists, what precise scope of work and success metrics have you defined for them?
- 3
How does this final decision alter your net cash runway and the timing of your upcoming equity seed round?
- 4
Why is a 'defer' or 'pivot' decision more commercially sound than spending further resources on an ill-fitting grant opportunity?
- 5
How have you updated the venture DNA to ensure future teams do not repeat the flawed funding assumptions uncovered during this process?